summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com>2020-05-18 11:34:47 +0200
committerKévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com>2020-05-18 11:34:47 +0200
commitb5ba7c92dacddf644250b95531999d7e41e14646 (patch)
tree166c2b88fc1c399d33f11d0aa792e0dd7a84cdf5
parentcbf30e45872d7a11fffcbf123710521805fb404e (diff)
downloadmemory-leaks-b5ba7c92dacddf644250b95531999d7e41e14646.tar.xz
Put a name on that metaphor I don't like
-rw-r--r--reviews/books.md20
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/reviews/books.md b/reviews/books.md
index c2f9d47..51326e6 100644
--- a/reviews/books.md
+++ b/reviews/books.md
@@ -25,8 +25,9 @@ author's point: they re-state their own convictions with added
cosmological sugar ("the principles by which nature works"),
antagonizing metaphors ("agriculture as an engineer might conceive
it"), sweeping generalities ("man has displayed a passion for
-simplifying it"), and romantic allegories ("the built-in checks and
-balances by which nature holds the species within bounds").
+simplifying it"), and romantic allegories^[See also: the Gaia
+hypothesis and its [criticism][gaia-critic].] ("the built-in checks
+and balances by which nature holds the species within bounds").
These sentences take a grim and uncomfortable (and well-documented)
reality, and transform it into a lyrical fresque of Good versus Evil.
@@ -35,19 +36,20 @@ insightful report, and twist it into a sublime, emotional, and
*simplified* depiction of some Universal Truth.
What bothers we with this vocabulary is that it is indistinguishable
-from zealotry. Cults successfully grow on broad, universal
-explanations for complex issues: Us versus Them, individual redemption
-for collective sins, Mother Nature… To me, these tropes are red
-flags; when I see them, I instinctively wonder where the fallacy is:
-why should the speaker need to appeal to some nebulous higher
-principle? Is it as universal as they claim? Why can't they root
-their point into observable evidence?
+from zealotry. Cults thrive on broad, universal explanations for
+complex issues: Us versus Them, individual redemption for collective
+sins, Mother Nature… To me, these tropes are red flags; they invite
+me to wonder where the fallacy is: why should the speaker need to
+appeal to some nebulous higher principle? Is it as universal as they
+claim? Why can't they root their point into observable evidence?
I actually do buy the authors's point; I merely wish it didn't come
with fake gold plating, since it makes people I want to share it with
go "Wait, what's up with that cheap cheesy decoration? It looks
silly".
+[gaia-critic]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_hypothesis#Criticism_in_the_21st_century
+
> Parathion is one of the most widely used of the organic phosphates.
> It is also one of the most powerful and dangerous. Honeybees become
> ‘wildly agitated and bellicose’ on contact with it, perform frantic