diff options
| author | Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com> | 2018-06-15 15:52:04 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com> | 2018-06-15 15:54:26 +0200 |
| commit | 206bcc6142d9c1a26ccc0f26c6da730f8f1fd3b0 (patch) | |
| tree | 3b939944466db1b502b0aef6c2a611f59af39c98 /technical/blog-roll.md | |
| parent | 0a1bf29ee247ce33b72f54d5b10327b89051799b (diff) | |
| download | memory-leaks-206bcc6142d9c1a26ccc0f26c6da730f8f1fd3b0.tar.xz | |
Start the blog roll
Aka "bookmarks with misguided commenraty".
Diffstat (limited to 'technical/blog-roll.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | technical/blog-roll.md | 20 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/technical/blog-roll.md b/technical/blog-roll.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6dd8849 --- /dev/null +++ b/technical/blog-roll.md @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +This is a list of blog-ish websites where I found insightful stuff +that I would like not to forget. + +# LispCast + +Eric Normand's musings on programming paradigms and their application, +with a soft spot for functional programming. + +[Programming Paradigms and the Procedural Paradox] (2017) +: A discussion on our tendency to conflate *paradigms* with their + *features*; for example, when trying to answer "can this language + express that paradigm?", we often reduce the question to "does + this language possess those features?". + + Normand wonders whether we do this because the procedural + paradigm's metaphor (a series of steps that each may contain any + number of sub-tasks) maps so well to its features (sequential + statements, subroutines) that it trained us to mix those up. + +[Programming Paradigms and the Procedural Paradox]: https://lispcast.com/procedural-paradox/ |
